DApp Design Patterns: Readability
An overview of common design patterns which allow a DApp to use the Creditcoin Oracle for cross chain readability.
Please note that all information and code snippets provided in this section are for educational purposes only and not to be directly deployed in production.
Creditcoin Oracle Design Patterns
How you can use the Creditcoin Oracle vs how you should.
Cross-chain DApps use Universal Smart Contracts in a way that is intended to be maximally flexible. With USC Readability, data from a source chain such as Ethereum can be securely moved cross-chain by the Creditcoin Oracle. That data can then be verified and used by the Universal DApp which lives on Creditcoin.
This way, the design space is left open for DApp teams to build whatever source chain logic they want and use the Creditcoin oracle to provision whatever data they want.
Most projects, however, are best served by following a specific pattern.
Source Chain dApp Contract
For more detail, read our page covering Source Chain Smart Contracts.
The scope of the source chain dApp contract should be as minimal as possible. It should focus on emitting events with data to be used by the Universal Smart Contract on Creditcoin.
We want to keep logic on the source chain as minimal as possible!
Users call a source chain smart contract.
(optional) Sometimes there's a piece of business logic which must take place on the source chain. For example, burning tokens. If so then we execute that here before emitting events.
The source chain contract emits one or more events.
That's all!
Universal Smart Contract
For more detail, read our page covering the Universal Smart Contract.
We want to make executing the universal smart contract as seamless as possible!
An off-chain worker listens for events from the source chain smart contract
The worker waits for the block containing the event to be attested on Creditcoin
The worker generates Merkle and continuity proofs using the Proof Generation API
The worker calls the USC contract with proofs and encoded transaction data
The USC contract verifies proofs synchronously using the Native Query Verifier Precompile
The USC contract executes business logic immediately in the same transaction. Business logic execution either takes place in the USC itself, or in a separate dApp contract which is called by the USC.
Best Practices
Beyond the flow of data described above, we outline some best practices to manage the source chain side of your Universal DApp:
A Universal DApp should have a single source chain contract which emits all the events relevant to the Creditcoin Oracle. That way, the offchain worker building oracle queries for your DApp only needs to follow events emitted from a single contract address.
Unambiguous events: Events should be unambiguous. Try to use unique events for each kind of oracle query you want to submit. For instance, a lending DApp tracking loans on Ethereum would want separate events for
LoanInitiatedandLoanRepaid.Clear event naming: Events should be named so that it's clear they will initiate cross-chain functionality. For instance, the event name
TokensBurnedForBridging(as used in the examples) clearly indicates a token burn action with the intent to bridge tokens cross-chain.Avoid common events: Don't initiate cross-chain functionality using common events such as standard
Transferevents. Instead, prefer to wrap actions in calls that emit more specific events such asTokensBurned. This makes it easier for workers to filter and process the correct events.Include all necessary data: Add all the relevant information you want moved cross-chain to the events emitted by the source chain contract. For instance, the
TokensBurnedevent should have fieldsfromandvalueindicating which account burned the tokens and how many tokens were burned. Otherwise the USC contract on Creditcoin won't know which account to mint tokens to or how many.
Next Steps
Check out this tutorial for an example of how to use the Creditcoin stack to set up a decentralized trustless bridge.
Last updated